This is Photoshop's version  of Lorem Ipsn gravida nibh vel velit auctor aliquet.Aenean sollicitudin, lorem quis bibendum auci elit consequat ipsutis sem nibh id elit.uci elit consequat ipsutis sem nibh id elituci elit consequat ipsutis ...

Follow me on instagram

Contact us

Eighth Avenue 487, New York 
Phone: +387643932728
Phone: +387123456789

Motion-Motion

The piece is enclosed in a small, white-walled room, about fifteen by twenty feet, with one closed door and no windows. The audience enters a dark room with a sliver of light which splits the darkness at the centre of the room. Standing at the edge of the room you can see the light gently drift up and down the wall and back and fourth across the floor. Emanating from the base of the wall, where it meets the floor on one side of the room, the source of the beam of light emits a modest mechanical whirring. There is just enough light to beckon, and as the audience enters they are met with a consistent and distinct, but indistinguishable sound. A cord is illuminated, skimming the floor, crossing the beam of light where a pair of headphones lie casting a long shadow. Blinking into the darkness the audience might be straining to feel into the senses to try to map the new environment. The sound, now recognized as intentional, also comes from the floor. With this understanding comes a keen awareness of the body in relation to the space, and a particular vulnerability to obstructions at ground level, which necessitates a careful maneuvering through the room. The soundtrack, which at this point resembles static, is subtle and familiar as it comes and goes. By moving further into the space and putting on the headphones, the listener is positioned within the beam of light, which now draws up the body and back down to retreat across the room. With the headphones on, the sound seeps into the ears of the listener and then exits on its way back to the speakers. At this point the audience might be tracking the light while trying to confirm the location of the sound. They might be sensing the immaterial motion of the space. As they attune to the environment, the audience may begin to feel involved, implicated. They might even recognize the triangulation that their body completes in space between the light and the floor, the speakers and headphones.

Play this accompanying binaural track on headphones for the immersive experience:

This first iteration of the work is referred to by the working title Motion-Motion. This project was inspired by Tim Ingold’s lecture Noise Sound Silence, in which he brings attention to the senses and stimulus, positing their independent generation. Proposing that the receipt of light and sound might actually be generated “in our head”, Ingold grounds his theory in the case of individuals experiencing sound and light in the absence of such stimulus.

As mentioned, the sound present in Motion-Motion is elusive. It is akin to the drone of a fan, heavy rain, or water running through pipes. I have, in fact, employed white noise in order to work with sound as material, tempering the space. Created from an equal measure of perceptible frequencies, white noise pads the environment of the listener from veritable sonic events and punctuating sounds. By this very method, I offer a layered experience of perceived internal environments, enveloped in sound.

The majority of white noise is derived from a natural source, rather than generated by digital software. This mediation of a natural event, waves crashing or heavy rain, is what I have perpetuated in creating white noise for Motion-Motion. I recorded my own extended exhale with a contact mic, then looped it in its most steady moment, for seven minutes of sustained sound. I also considered the subtle cycles evident in the reproduction of white noise in nature and emulated its almost seamless recycling of a consistent sound.

The concept of white noise is applied to “pink noise”, “brown noise” and “blue noise” – mimicking with frequency, the levels of the color spectrum. Given the sonic environment, I found the slightly higher frequency of my exhale to nestle-in nicely with the other sounds present in the installation – the whirring of the projector, the rumble of trucks passing on Great Northern Way, and the buzz of a campus full of fluorescent lights. The audibly blue-noise soundscape serves to gently lift the focus from the incidental noise floor to an intentional composition.

Ingold notes of the experience of light and sound, that “an impervious boundary separates mind and world and mediates our exchanges between them and that boundary is the body, including it’s sensory organs, and the touch sensitive envelope of the skin. […] Light and sound are neither in here or out there… the very experience of light or of sound is one in which the boundary is dissolved.” In considering this boundary, I intend the light and sound in Motion-Motion to permeate the borders of the body in a way that the audience might take note of.

The blue noise soundtrack was further manipulated, by an analogue animation technique that I have developed to spatialize sound in a way that reads as human. The looped blue noise was played back through a speaker acting as a single source of sound. I then recorded this single point of sound in space using in-ear binaural microphones. While wearing the microphones I moved my body in space, actively recording the blue noise track in different positions around my moving body. I moved towards and away from the speakers paying attention to how my weight swayed. I moved through circles, spirals and figure-eights created by my body. The result is a binaural audio track which features the blue noise moving autonomously in space, reanimating the sound around the body of the listener. I continue to record sounds that move with the same expression and limitations as the human body because it gives the sound life by nuance.

I recorded this same movement standing between a source of light and the camera, inverting the colors and increasing the contrast. The result is a shadow made of light swaying and swooping across the screen. When the video is projected, it creates light which also moves throughout the room as if it had a physical form.

The binaural recording of the blue noise is played in-tandem with the moving light projection in the final installation. Fulfilling seven minutes of a fluctuating ebb and flow throughout the space, light and sound are exchanged between the body of the listener and the projector and speakers.

The notion of boundaries permeated is proposed through the use of two separate tracks playing the same binaural blue noise. One plays through the headphones and one plays through the speakers. The headphones and speakers take turns transmitting sounds fading in and out at a rate similar to a cycle of breath or waves breaking and withdrawing. The effect is the auditory illusion that the binaural blue noise moves back and fourth between the speakers and the headphones. Entering the room, the listener might hear the sound coming through the speakers first, or they may encounter the effect of the light first and find the headphones placed at the intersection of the action. Putting on the headphones and finding the sound here, just before it disappears results in much of the volume from the speakers being blocked by the headphones. The headphones create the final level of impasse.

Motion-Motion works with the immaterial, activated by darkness. The provisional nature of the setup up; speakers, headphones, and a projector on the floor – laid bare – are overlooked in the dark. Distraction from the technical setup is meant to direct attention inwards, to feel the body and sense within the space and is not meant to deceive the audience. While the light is an invitation to participate and situate within the installation, it also illuminates the sources of sound, depicting the gear as-is, functioning as a point of departure. I strive to soften the presence of technology while sensitizing the body, so that light and sound become perceptual material. The tech laying on the floor is reduced to a tool as I attempt to strip it of its typical role in enchanting an audience, while gate-keeping its production.

Proprioception negotiates the boundary of the body as it encounters the surrounding space. By bringing attention to the bodily boundary, what is ours and with is other is temporarily bridged and, perhaps for a moment, we can leave our immediate bodily circumstance.

The entire installation runs on a synchronized loop. The effect is the opposite of a performance, where the events transpiring in the space are independent of any audience. This places the choice to enter, to stay and to exit on the audience. A natural hesitancy in darkness and an unwillingness to spend time are inherent conditions of the installation. The experience is relatively ambiguous and the invitation isn’t entirely prescriptive. With this I hope to create a space where the audience must seek an experience and is, in turn, rewarded with the chance to be with themselves and embody the perceptible motion.